- #How to play lan ultimate apocalypse soulstorm mod#
- #How to play lan ultimate apocalypse soulstorm mods#
You can have same experience by downgrading to disk version with LAN support and use VPN software of your choice: hamachi, game ranger, FreeLAN, etc. It's a problem of maintenance of official lobby servers by SEGA/Relic. while DoW online isnt necessary it certainly helps UA rely on DOW multiplayer code.ĭoW multiplayer problems are not steam related. i soon found out that was because steam sucks and has 'ghost servers' which are unjoinable and dont dissapear. Third point, when i first tried to play multiplayer on DoW i couldnt join any lobbys. It's made by totally unknown group of people. Originally posted by rusty_dragon:Re-read again. while DoW online isnt necessary it certainly helps
#How to play lan ultimate apocalypse soulstorm mods#
in fact it removes the campaign unlike other mods like TW so its less single player than other mods.
Why use some untrusted mod, if you can have same experience without it? It's totally unnecessary software.
#How to play lan ultimate apocalypse soulstorm mod#
is the ultimate apocalypse mod also shady? i dont know the identity of its creator irl? Re-read again. This superiority in armour should be used to your advantage as much as possible. From the Chimera transport tanks all the way up to super heavy, multi-barrelled monsters like the Baneblade and Stormhammer. Originally posted by ReaperBoy909:sooo anything that isnt official is shady? i have an anti virus but the government hasnt said its part of them, that mean its 'shady'? and youre the one arguing with no evidence, why provide evidence to disprove an argument with no evidence? and most things online not made by big companies are run by unknown people. The Imperial Guard boasts some of the best and varied armour in Dawn of War that allow the Imperial Guard to meet any foe with an iron fist. Ultimate Apocalypse mod is not shady, cause it's singleplayer. Look at mods for C&C multiplayer, for example. Multiplayer mods like this are typically run by community.
Why should anyone use it then? sooo anything that isnt official is shady? i have an anti virus but the government hasnt said its part of them, that mean its 'shady'? and youre the one arguing with no evidence, why provide evidence to disprove an argument with no evidence? and most things online not made by big companies are run by unknown people. It gives nothing over using disk version. It's a completely unknown project run by unknown people. It is shady because it is not official, neither it is made by some person known by community. Originally posted by rusty_dragon:You keep telling it works better, but give no examples.
0 kommentar(er)
